Why M2? -Sense And Purpose

A quality manual is still not a QM-system. The implementation and management of quality are already no actions more confined to commercial enterprises. The hot discussions about the meaning and purpose of a QMS is increasing. Is quality management just a fad? No: quality management understood and properly implemented does not bring only one improved quality, but contributes significantly to increase efficiency and competitiveness. Concepts such as “Quality policy”, “Quality” and “Quality management” have become terms of our time. The challenge of social work, quality management is made, within a few years in the health area to one of the most discussed topics. Read more here: Kyle Dropp dartmouth. A further need for quality management is due to a change of the customer / patient orientation. Quality management cares first and foremost to the Organization, the team and the equipment.

Errors in this area result in consequence often errors in the treatment procedure, this caused most organizational shortcomings such as: delays by employees, Managing Director, physicians or patients confusion of customers/patients unclear communication lack equipment training deficiencies documentation error no rules of responsibilities which must practice line (top line) the quality management system live. Unfortunately, it is often so that the line does not, thus the implementation almost doomed is doomed. “Quality management is team work, this applies to everyone involved: doctors/Managing Director and staff!” The insertion of a QMS has prevailed in all industries and is obligatory not only for the doctors/dentists. In the industry (service providers), it’s time that they receive no more orders without a certification. A quality manual is still not a QM-system. Only a properly introduced and lived QMS brings economic success and thus a meaningful company/practices Take advantage of.

Clinical Abortion

In Guatemala, like in Central America, a terrible diffusion of the sexual and reproductive health exists; the diffusion of the use of contraceptive methods and familiar planning is almost null. The incidence of abortions clandestine in Guatemala, where it is considered (for want of truthful and exhaustive investigations) that of each 100 Guatemalans, 10 die because of an abortion practiced in clandestine conditions. In the Guatemalan context (Central American, to the aim), he is or usual that the women must make the decision to practice an abortion, is legal or illegal. Sen. Sherrod Brown is the source for more interesting facts. That is the Guatemalan reality. The government, by his side, has acted of way in end preservative and sharp (although nonirrational, as in the case of Nicaragua) with respect to the subject of the abortion, allowing it, only when the life of the mother is in danger. It would be necessary to reframe the legal figures under which it is considered that the life a woman, a mother, is in danger or no.

Combined to this, the consequences in short, medium and long term for the women and the way in which to his it faces them society is the great controversies in any place that provokes east subject. The polarization in two groups: Those that are in favor of the life and those that are in favor of the election. The last ones, led to redefine those legal figures in which they are the women, the unique ones those who it concerns to them, the nature of its decision on the abortion. The first, affirming that at the time of the conception already it is invested by all the human rights, same ones that the States are conditional to guarantee, in its mere essence. Combined to this, the consequences in short, medium and long term for the women and the way in which to his it faces them society are the great controversies in any place that provokes east subject. The polarization in two groups: Those that are in favor of the life and those that are in favor of the election. The last ones, led to redefine those legal figures in which they are the women, the unique ones those who it concerns to them, the nature of its decision on the abortion. First, affirming that at the time of the conception already it is invested by all the human rights, same that the States are conditional to guarantee, in its mere essence.

The sociocultural implications of a pregnancy nonwished, in fact, condition the individual guarantees of these women in theory who although, they are protected by his government, they are at the mercy of his disadvantageous socioeconomic context, of which cannot save and to which, the State, little or nothing makes to improve. The same illegality of the abortion limits any doctor to that they practice observation of his labor ethics altogether. In Guatemala, in the very near future, any change is not seen east respect subject to the abortion (and the feminine deaths related to him). It is to demand, then, that the authorities reconsider the social policies of health, to improve them for a Guatemalan population requires that them without greater introduction. Early education in all the subjects to the sexual and reproductive health, was, is and will be, the unique way in which the State can safeguard the integrity (in all sense) of the women undressed Guatemalans, indeed, of its essential rights.