The severity, we could not give name the same to the same rock that we contemplate in the interval of a lowermost fraction of second. We ourselves also already we would be another one: I who suspirou for as before coming back to contemplate the rock, already am one another one I. But before dealing with this I, think about other perspectives on the rock, only to remember that all our conjecturas do not pass of a perspective, the perspective human being. Many philosophers already had leaned over themselves on the substance concept, and of this they had created categories, classifications. They had only been forgotten to say that it was an interpretation human being. Therefore a camel imagines walking for the desert and if coming across with this rock now. How it enxerga? We do not know.
Probably it would turn aside itself from the rock. A snake perhaps, whose visual device is different to the one of the man and to the one of the camel, until crawled until the top of the rock, without apparent reason, and also would follow its way. Now let us think about a human being that, either for genetic engineering, or aid of advanced technological devices extreme, did not enxergasse the rock in the banal way we enxergamos that it, but the movement of each electron and the interaction of these with the waves and air particles to its redor. To go more far, we go to assume a terrestrial extra being incapable to visualize the rock as a particular being, but a particle confusion? perhaps nor let us call electrons here, it sees another thing? in interaction with particles of everything in return: of air, of the sand, the rays of sun and eventually of electromagnetic waves that come of the space. Perhaps this terrestrial extra being, this rock is not something massive; perhaps even exactly, for the constitution of its body, it can cross the rock, as well as us we cross the water or air.
E many voters still thinking that the petty politics of the politics is not to the politics of the petty politics. They had killed Squid! They had killed Squid? This exactly. The word Squid was deceased, and is silenced in the mouth of many candidates the re-election in all the country. These many candidates who have few days spoke badly, criticized and motejavam the presidential government were against the Squid! Today, it is enough to leave house and to look at the appearances politicians who print cars, walls and walls for all Brazil, all want its photo next to this such of Squid. To be next to the people who had made something is to feel the pleasure of remembering, and who is remembered in an election gains vote, or, many votes better. The petty politics walks untied and in this straight line route to day 03 of October, which would be the reeligible one that it would make the madness of speaking badly of the Squid if candidatando to lose a piece of the slice of the so gigantic cake: ' ' More than 70% of approval nacional.' ' To analyze what each one of the candidates the re-election made or left to make is one of the ways for the search of the aiming of state vote national. Day 03 of October if approaches, vote is consequence, votes certain, not vote in the petty politics, votes in the sustainable growth. (Jnior Faj,)
Brazil presents important studies, as the Europe and the United States, in the area of geopolitics, with prominence, mainly in the seio of the Armed Forces and entailed entities the agencies of planning of national geography. Shiguenoli Miyamoto inside presents a division of the periods of bigger importance of the picture of production of geography Brazilian politics. (1) Years 1920/1930: gnese of the country; (2) Years 1940: world-wide conflict and matureness of geopolitics; (3) Climate of cold war and sprouting of the ESF (up to 1964); (4) Military blow of 64 (security and development); (5) Years 1980/90: redemocratizao/international cooperation. The first period is marked by few authors in the field of the knowledge of geography politics, as Elyseo de Carvalho, Everardo Backheuser, Thin Carlos of Oak, Mrio Travassos and Franscisco de Paula City. All had almost suffered that the same influence under the determinista school, where the presence of Ratzel is visible. Backheuser is considered the first one to give impulse to national geopolitics.
However, Elyseo de Carvalho was surely the first one to reflect the paper of geopolitics as propeller and determinative element in the destinations of the country. Beyond these, Thin by Oak, in 1929, it took important space in the quarrels. In 1930 it also appears Mrio Travassos that presents the antagonisms of the South American continent and if it worries about a possible pro-Argentina disequilibrium. Its analysis projected the country for ampler picture, being later followed for others authors as Golbery of the Couto and Silva. Beyond these, Pablo City, in 1934, specifically approached the geography military of the continent. In the period of World War II, he had a great increment in the production of geopolitical studies. The writings of Houshoffer and the German production in general way had reached its apogee and the remaining portion of the world took knowledge of its existence.