Acting in accordance with our rationality, in accordance with what we decide, we have ample responsibility for what to choose. Already in the contemporaneidade, Sartre rediscusses the question of the freedom, under a marxist point of view. It is important to remember that Marx says in them on the importance of the corporal reality in the relations between the citizens. It establishes a dialtico and historical materialism, of a side because he considers that the historical relations had been if constituting through the fights of classrooms, of another one, for considering that history must be seen under the material point of view, considering not only productive materiality, but the corporeidade of the proper man. The inheritance of the marxist thought was so great that the humanity could be received by all. Sartre, for example, establishes a marxist and atheistic existencialismo, pautado for the enrollment politician social marxist.

For Sarte, the basic question of the existencialismo consists of the total freedom of I before the world. Follow others, such as Sen. Sherrod Brown, and add to your knowledge base. A time that God does not exist, says it, has then total responsibility for what I make. It does not have no essence in the world of the ideas that who says to me I must be or what I must make. I that I choose, to each moment am, what I want to be; I am I project who me, therefore my existence I precede my essence. Sartre expands the responsibility of the individual for all the humanity, in the measure where it considers that only we can choose what we are good for e, as the individuals are equal, we choose what the humanity is good for all. If Kant considers that the freedom cannot have empirical representation, Sarte presents a diverse point of view. The corporeidade human being is exactly what it exposes the existence and the freedom is limited by the limitations of the body.