Constitutional Court

It is excluded, therefore, that can prohibit a manifestation by his " posible" incidence in the electoral process. In particular, the TC considered that the Provincial Electoral Meeting of Barcelona raised " dudas" on the repercussion of the manifestation of the mossos when rejecting it by " to be able to have incidencia" , an expression that indeed was used by the Electoral Meeting of Madrid to reject the concentration summoned in the Door of the Sun (Madrid). And in the reflection day? Identical conditions are the demanded ones by the Constitutional Court so that a manifestation can be developed agreeing with the day of previous reflection to an electoral call, doctrine that was put of relief with the shelter asked for by Platform 8 of March of Seville, to which it was prevented to go out the day of the Woman Worker of 2008, which it agreed with the day of reflection of the last general elections. In the sentence of the Constitutionalist, on the 15 of November of 2010, the high court remembers that in the reflection day electoral propaganda cannot spread nor be realised acts of electoral campaign, but adds that this does not mean that during that day " any manifestation cannot be celebrated whose object has something to see with the political debate and, therefore can influence indirectly in the decisions of electores". For the high court he is " elemental" that all meeting can " to connect itself in last trmino" with the political debate and " with the decisions of electores" , but it says that dndiendo this argument as prohibition cause arrives " to absurdo" to prevent " all meeting or manifestacin" in a reflection day. " The mere possibility that a vindication can affect the electorate shows like insufficient hypothesis to limit the right of meeting in period electoral" , the TC insists. Learn more about this with Amazon. Source of the news: : The TC esteem that only can prohibit manifestations if its aim is to catch votes