Although debt negotiation companies have a bad reputation, I do not think we can judge them all equally. It is true that some companies take advantage of trading debts of customers, but also a large number of serious companies that have achieved very good results. In fact I have noticed that most of the complaints that customers have come from unrealistic expectations about what is entering a debt negotiation. Here are some examples of the most common misunderstandings that can help you understand a little more the possibilities and limits of debt negotiation companies. The biggest problem I see in the market for clients, is that the latter because of their desperation are sometimes easy targets and do not use common sense to analyze these companies well, choosing either. The other is that customers will assume that only paying cents for his debt and credit card companies will not choose to sue them once they enter into a program trading – which is totally false.
Currently a debt negotiation company usually can negotiate quality between 40-60% of the debt. You can pay more or pay less. In any case, neither company would brag about saving money client not to enter the program, which was sued as a result end up paying for 80% of its debt. Unlike going to flaunt the client only had to pay 20% of its debt. Both examples are real, though seldom so extreme. It is more logical to estimate that the customer can account for between 40-60% of the debt in a settlement.
Bulbs away from Villanueva Fuentes municipal explained that it has been the own mayor who has submitted his resignation to Mayor Ana Botella. Last week, bottle He said that he was confident in his team and denied a resounding to dismiss anyone, appealing to the presumption of innocence to justify its decision. So far, the consistory has denied any responsibility by action or omission in the deaths of the four girls. Therefore, the resignation of Calvo is a setback to the arguments used so far by bottle and his team. However, his departure serves the Mayor to protect his right hand, Miguel Angel Villanueva.
Vice-Mayor has admitted knowing to personally Miguel Angel Flores, organizer of the concert which ended in tragedy and accused in the case. He also confirmed that he had held several of their birthday celebrations at the premises of the employer. Flores had already contracted with the area of economy on numerous occasions and Villanueva is responsible for this area. In addition, the councilman Flores’s brother, Jose Maria, married last year. The doubts of the case Tuesday, judge visited the Madrid Arena to try to reconstruct the events the last November 1. Until now, City Hall has admitted that the Pavilion has no operating license, which fails to comply with the safety regulations in force and that had structural deficiencies. As President of Madrid Espacios y Congresos, Pedro Calvo had been commissioned to argue that the licence is not required under article 151 of the Act 9/2001 of the soil of the community of Madrid and the article 4.e of the Municipal Ordinance of processing of urban development licenses. According to the Unified Trade Union of police (SUP), the shows law of the community of Madrid and the law of sport (Madrid Arena is a sports arena multi-purpose) make it compulsory. In fact, MEyC tried to obtain this permit in 2010, but the Department of urbanism was denied for not complying with the law.