Georg Lukcs Society

The civil society has its proper institutions to take the claims to the State, being been the political parties the main institutions, but also the social unions and movements. He standes out despite not to have itself to confuse civil society with opposition, he must yourself be understood as the agents politicians who are of scope of the government. Therefore the activity politics of the State aims at to get the consensus of the civil society, becomes hegemonic. Participating of the civil society they are the social movements, that make the base politics. The social movements enjoy of autonomy, ahead as if to give the manifestations of the culture in the plan of the politics, certain of that cultural manifestations appear as half for the accomplishment of objectives politicians, thus the author detaches that the culture does not have to be forgotten therefore it has a function politics, that is, is can be used with a purpose politics. Thus being the ruling class the society tries to impose a culture, as if the values were universal.

The culture if becomes in an ideological support of orientation politics, to legitimize the power of the ruling class. therefore that Georg Lukcs philosopher and Hungarian politician, to observe in cultural a form of strategy politics to take the power, from> elaboration of a new cultural politics, is possible to develop a new conscience of classroom, through a cultural revolution, would develop the proper ideological sustentation of the Revoluo.Ver here the instrumentalizao politics of the culture with revolutionary purpose. As the ruling class also makes use of the culture with an ideological function, thus in such a way the use of the culture as ideology serves in such a way for who is in the power, ideology conservative, as for that they desire to change the power through a revolution, liberating ideology. Gramsci calls this ' ' war of posio' ' promoted cultural and ideological politics before the conquest of the state, in the revolutionary fight.

Russian Kabarda

The establishment of formal contact with Kabarda in understanding the Russian authorities meant the beginning of the development of North-West and Central Caucasus, as in the works, gives scientists the center of all the other tribes were listed tributaries Kabardins. That is, the development of the region should be realized not only by construction of fortresses (later defensive lines), but also by seeking support in the face "of local natives." However, the rate of the Russian government does not respect the strong Kabarda, and the Ossetian society. Why not Kabarda? There are two good reasons: the "external" and "internal". "External" reason is that Russia, acquiring more land to satisfy the imperial ambitions of reaching the natural boundaries, intrude into the sphere of influence to the currently more powerful empires of the Ottoman Empire and Iran. War, the Iranian Safavid dynasty and the Ottoman port (and its vassal – Crimean ) xvi century, the expansion of the Iranian shah Abbas, Safi I, Abbas ii xvii century speak of two sides confrontation (in spite of Russia's attempts to intervene, which leads to the Russian-Turkish war of 1676 – 1681 gg.). That is, in xvi – xvii centuries the Caucasus is a buffer zone of interest. And Kabarda as the most powerful predgosudarstvennoe Education is at the junction of interests between the two countries. Consequently, the elite, acting, in accordance with their own desires and perspectives acted in the interests of those who promised great benefits – Turkey, Iran – Russia, if and perceived by some princes, as a reliable ally, was not at the moment "real player" in the international arena.