Some Simple Concepts to Explain Politcal Advances

At the beginning of this paper we referred to the notion of velodrome or advances. Fortunately, when you’ve had the opportunity and the criterion of “participant observation”, tour of Argentina and complement it with prior or subsequent analysis of the extensive existing literature, though little known, we find that there are many business initiatives, governmental and community spontaneously are giving answers, which reflect the perception of these situations whose complexity can infer the reader, if you have reached this stage of exposure. Throughout the written communications that we have made since mid-1977, we have been coining some concepts, which summarize the experiences and studies we have been doing.

This is reflected in the titles of some of those communications. Postulate: “Dust the potential Argentina,” the urgent need for a generation of priests (makers of bridges), the “creative optimization of the existent,” the identification of some “making up the country on their own.” I stop in the latter label, because it serves to illustrate some of these behaviors (because that is all the time), which do hold to what we describe and postulate. It turns out that back in the late fifties, it was a transfer from families with mining culture Tinogasta (Catamarca) and around to the city of Caleta Olivia in northern Santa Cruz. As were feelings in Catamarca, almost immediately generated a flow of travelers between the two areas. Usually they met people from different families to cover the cost of car fuel in which they moved. But is that once a vehicle owner who found no want to carpool and expenditures among his acquaintances, and then advertised in local media.

Individuality and Art

The result is an area enclosed on individuality, which in many cases leads to crime, drugs, or various manifestations of violence, including suicide. But there is a sector in search of his identity, trying to generate their own institutions. To not get away from the issue of culture, we will refer only to those events whose central theme is the arts. They are characterized by their resistance to instituted spaces. Manifest from the collective and anonymous use of the walls, in some cases, exceeding the classical painted murals reaching artistic, in musicians, theater groups, mimes, living statues, jugglers, etc. etc. installed in streets, public places or means of transport, claiming not only the collective economic contribution but also express their decision to communicate their art or their concerns, outside the official spaces. It includes, most especially, the many youth centers of culture, whatever the name to be awarded, perfect example of the presence of a project, which involves oral language codes, habits, practices, new mingled with those inherited from previous generations particularly with some signs of recovery of nuances of popular culture and militant of the 70 ‘.

In short, the society of the new century, grows two conflicting views. One, moral recovery, flags environmental, ethical principles in politics, media, the economy. The other, the stark reality of the decline, manifested in the “surge” in crime, drug abuse, political corruption, corporate and financial, illiteracy, extreme poverty, etc. This raises a new contradiction, to feed the collective anxiety. It puts us in direct contact with a reality that we call beautiful, not in the sense that gave Alejo Carpentier, who dazzled by the Caribbean landscape, said that the French surrealists had not invented anything.

Accepting Marginalized Professionals

Now with regard to marginalized professionals, we say that the latter pay them salaries that are a little beyond the minimum wage. But a series of taxes well protected by the laws of any nation, should be responsible to bring those salaries to a condition close to the minimum wage. Therefore the latter does not reach out of their condition, professional workers. Those who succeed do so on random fortune, for a lifetime of luxury and denial to any stacking capital. By cunning or effort.

But please note that the need and poverty of the inhabitants, often ends with the effort. Of the two beasts say. That there is no state land who wants the sword to kill them, metaphorically speaking. I refer to alcohol, cigarette, or Tobacco. Which ultimately end up destroying families and health.

This kind of economic system. Pass over any citizen, since it represents a completely infinite value and valuable for industry, trade, economy and the boldest of them all, politics. Above all, get to see on a throne of sand, the god “power.” That everything moves. That all I can. But his coolness has no limit, injustice is the first ally. And many allies that arise from this genre. An entire planet was not enough, natural resources were not sufficient, much less the maximum. And every good rule was scrapped. Greed, corruption and vanity. They go crazy for all men, from the youngest to the oldest. But justice will bring the essence of good to his virtue will lower time. noble sentiments, wisdom turn teach that most grandeur and dignity. Is in a strenuous practice of holiness. Which is the most difficult of all virtues. Since our human nature clings easily to vices. But If you look at the men from time to time, we see that there are still many families in the villages. Helping their neighbors as themselves. They seek to love one another. I am not referring to the churches. I speak in general. Both in them, and out of them. In every place and time, there will be righteous. Thus ended this slight exposure, with a beautiful smile. No I can only tell you whether they can succeed. Know how to wisely manage their powerful monopolies. And never forget their roots. Since call them lifted. And the earth is full of them. Let us be brothers in action, not religion. That illuminates your soul and divinity coracles.

Philosophical Theories On The Political Constitution Of Colombia

Why is that a country serves to create a constitution, if not teach? In what serves as a country have a constitution if he does not know? In what country will be served papers on the teaching of the constitution, whether academic, not taken into gutter? Is it that it is unethical for academic institutions that oversee education, teach the provisions of the law? Is not it illegal for educational institutions, do not have a subject called up and they in turn teach the philosophers? Is not that poor countries which care little about the teaching of standard rules? To what order establishing a constitution? What if the constitution is a mere formality? Is it not important to the teaching of standard rules? What if the constitution corrupts men rather than make them better? What does the standard rules for a country? Is the constitution sensationalist propaganda or really make sense? Is it bad that people know the laws? Is it better to ignore what a government formed its own people? What if the constitution does not deserve to be a core subject because it is unworthy to be taught? Does love for the law is a poison? “Reflection on the law impoverishes a nation?

“The constitution is any good? Is this rule of rules is a fleeting speculation? “The constitution is a document without regard? Really the standard rules used for anything? Does the constitution was a document created to show other countries that this country also has its own, or was created by knowingly? “The constitution is adequate to govern a country or the same is governed by the fortunes of chance? What the original meaning has the standard rules? Are poor countries are those who teach the Constitution? “The constitution is government property or people and their leaders? Does the government know the reason for the constitution? Does the implementation of the constitution can destroy a nation? Is it better to ignore this book because it is useless knowledge? Does a country should have its own constitution and it is more desirable to follow the knowledge of foreign laws? Does the Constitution teaches the value of the laws or do not really teach anything?

“In the course of history have shown that constitutions are worthless? Is it more polite when people are unaware of their laws? Is religion a people when you do not know about politics? Do the policy lessons should be banned? The thing is a farce or policy sense? “The law of laws closed the understanding of men to be hollow and empty or more nationalistic? Does it benefit a country that tramples on the constitution police and despise? Do politicians because politicians understand the constitution? Is there a policy of the constitution? “The laws are the cause of political wisdom? What is the difference between this and this? Can you explain what the laws? What do you think the people of the laws? What do you think of philosophers and sociologists of law? Is not psychology is a sham? “In our country, understand the law? Is the art of politics is to train law? What is the purpose of the constitution? If you ignore the nature of the laws can know their meaning and interpretation of nature? What is the Constitution? Do politicians have made discoveries in the judicial branches? Is it important to discover the nature of government or is a difficult question that deserves no importance?

“The constitution is a mixture of politics and reason? Are images of laws can stand in our spirit? Is it possible that the constitution and politics are different and yet have the same properties? Is it necessary to know the opposite of constitution and laws? Those who know the laws are in a state different from all those who do not know? Do citizens have some kind of wisdom? Do the laws must be obeyed by knowingly or by submission? What qualities allow us to know the object of politics and the law? Are the policy judgments are always true or false? Do the strategies of government develop properly or by chance? What difference to the policy of the law? Is politics a science or an art? Are the legal elements are unreliable or are arbitrary and falsehood? That government is best, that of reason or of religion? What are the correct methods to quell the strife generated by the speech? “Education is for connoisseurs and for all in general? How do you demonstrate democratic principles? How does the law and what are its causes? Does this kind of issues are ridiculous and should be treated with rigor?

Do military armies know the laws? To some people they should know about politics and not others? Do the judges know how to judge, really know it is a trial? Should lawmakers want good things for their countries? “When required by law as can know which are bad and they are good? How can observe the laws that seem right but they really are vicious? “Politicians love is for the same moral or not necessary? What is the moral of the politicians? Are moral politicians? Is it important that the state properly educate the young? Are the educated young men in the future will be good citizens? Is it appropriate to teach children the baseness of the vices and disintegrate as the same family? Do you have much more value the Industry of the vices that people who do not enrich the industry because it is rational? How bad a state differs from a good one? “Politically, as one can judge the defect of virtue all states possess the land? Do you now what are the best states of the earth? What are the states most mediocre? How can a state command respect with its citizens? 1) For the territories of the world are called with a name.


The Contradictions Of Capitalism And Communism

This time we will be addressing gradually capitalist and communist theories. In order to know how successful they are in social reality. In addition to noting that both have contributed to society in education, politics and economics. Only then will we know in theory that we can put more emphasis on social practice. Or if on the contrary we must dismiss both systems and devising new ones. Or trying to devise new ones will not only turn in circles, but attempts to bring down these two systems which I think are useless. Issue that is appropriate to seek a look, let’s begin. Before initiating such inquiry, it is important to define the concept of capitalism and communism.

Capitalism: Economic system in which private individuals and business firms carry out production and exchange of goods and services through complex transactions involving prices and markets. Although it has its origins in antiquity, the development of capitalism is a European phenomenon, has evolved in different stages to be considered established in the second half of the nineteenth century. From Europe, specifically from England, the capitalist system was extended to the whole world, being the almost exclusive socio-economic system at the global level until the outbreak of World War I, after which established a new socioeconomic system, the communism, which became the opposite of capitalism. Communism: A term from the early nineteenth century, refers to those theories and political actions to defend an economic and political system based on the socialization of production systems and state control (partial or complete) of economic sectors, which frontally opposed to the principles of capitalism.

Public Security and the Common Good

Assuming that TRADEPA will become a political reference in Bolivia, I must ask: what are the five main proposals TRADEPA for the country? VJ: They can be summarized in the following ideas: – National Unity versus autonomy process. – Security National hypothetical to foreign intervention. – Effectiveness of Public Security and Public Safety. – Guarantees for private property. – Duration of individual rights in the EPC constant. – Equity and social justice. – Exploitation of natural resources with the most benefit.

Bolivian Geopolitics MD: Tradepa proposed: that the Police and the Armed Forces, are upgraded and strengthened to defend the homeland and its natural resources, let me ask: What economic resources was reached that goal? VJ: We propose the creation of a National Defense Fund based on expenses reserved as a percentage of direct tax on hydrocarbons. MD Military and Social Movements: The actions of the military in past decades were part of the National Security doctrine advocated by the U.S. empire, this doctrine the exercise of power allocated to the South American military, in times of emergency social and indigenous movements, what should be the Bolivian military doctrine? VJ: The Armed Forces are an instrument of policy and given its character of being essentially obedient and will have followed the guidelines of the managers of the political factor is that governments, but the military doctrine is structured on defense policies, institutional and operational are set to achieve an interference-free situation needed to achieve the highest state order that is the common good.